Monday, 15 March 2010

The Bradford Grid: big screen commission

Creativity and Leadership: a matter of identity and a question of design

This image was taken in my office - early morning Monday 15th March, 2010. A the top it shows two of my sketchbooks opened at strategic places the one on the left is a page that shows a photo taken a couple of years ago of a footpath, gravel, lettering, cigarette ends etc. This image surrounded by some of my own writing that is circling in a spiral around the picture. On the right of the table at the top is another page from a diary - the text that you can't quite read is from the previous post and looks at alternative ways of representing space - Miro and Modrian are good examples of the extremes in the representation of space and relations between objects in space in painting.

On the bottom half of the table on the left is a worksheet from a course that I attended - a six month long course in Leadership - I was a coach on the course and on top of the worksheet is my badge from the course. on the right at the bottom, an assignment from a course that I am currently doing at Uni - PGCert in Leadership and Management. In between these two documents are some name badges that I have used for work as well as my business card. All aspect of identity. All a question of Design in some way.

[Click on the image - it should expand for grater detail.]

Friday, 12 March 2010

Space - the final front...


Navigation is the planned action that is taken between spaces, between zones.

When the eye comes to rest - in dwell-time - it engages with a communicative artefact (say, a painting or a page) it then oscillates between a fixed point of interest and the search for another object.

The visual sense - grasps, speculates and questions: finds the necessary cues and clues to create meaning or value. It simultaneously gathers certainty, makes distinctions whilst it finds answers to the very questions that it seeks.

In truth, the eye is very rarely at rest. If it were, we would take in nothing.

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

Braque's "Violin with Candlestick"

Stage Two in our journey on the module "Visual Communication".

In relation to the image on the left painted by Braque in 1910, consider the following:

1. Multiple viewpoints.
2. Combination of "symbolic signs" and "iconic signs".
3. Fragmentation of picture surface.
4. Abstraction and the role of composition.

Wednesday, 16 December 2009

USA Today

 
USA Today logo - copied from the Media News International website, 16/12/09.


In their book Remediation and elsewhere, Boltor and Grusin (2002) have used the USA Today as an example of graphical conventions moving across various different media, in this case some of the visual presentation of content in television migrating to print and to web and then back again! Other critics on graphic design, Lupton and Millar, have also suggested that the USA Today broadsheet resembles aspects of television news. It also paved the way for ways of incorporating content onto their website. A comparison between their website and the paper versions of same day news stories can be very instructive when thinking through some of the key graphical conventions that survive the transformation from print to screen. If we are to build a vocabulary of graphic design suitable for both contexts (print /screen) then USA Today makes for a good initial case study. In addition, the critical writing on the evolution of this paper, especially its design and layout, gives it further significance.

Introduced in the mid eighties, along with many other papers incorporating full colour into newsprint, exploiting this potential in their graphics, the visual design of the paper was considered to innovative in terms of its design. But in more conservative design circles, as well as amongst journalists, they saw this as a further "dumbing down" of the press, not least with the apparent overuse of information graphics.

These issues as well as a detailed analysis of the logo, a key part of their branding, forms the first case study for the Imaging and Design students in their lecture on "Type, Identity and Branding" next semester.





Friday, 11 December 2009

Composition in Cezanne: a simple task

Paul Cezanne, Saint Victoire, oil on canvas, 69.9 x 89.5 cm.
This image is being used as the first task for the Visual Communications course. After looking at a few paintings and discussing various compositional elements integral to the painting: larger spatial structures, the organisation of distinctive plains and surfaces, the division of the canvas into distinctive zones and the clustering of details, as well as describing where colour abd tome have an impact on the overall composition., students are asked to write about this image. Cezanne had gradually built up his own unique way of responding to and recording the visual world. And whilst there are some conventional ways of organising his compositions that reference neo-classical ways proportions, there are some highly innovative ways that Cezanne has organised the picture plain in a way that, on the one hand, exhibits some kind of 'truth' to the subject - landscape, hillside, houses and trees, horizon etc - as well as creating features that focus purely the sensation of the image - its atmosphere. This is what is so striking about images like this. To gain an understanding of some of the compostional qualities of the above try these tasks.

The task is to simply write down what you see in relation to the following visual attribute:
  • colour
  • line
  • shape
The second part of the task is to draw lines across the image that indicate the main compositional elements.

Monday, 7 December 2009

Space-time and the image: composition in 'La Primavera'


Sandro Botticelli,  La Primavera, c.1462 Tempera on panel 203 cm × 314 cm (80 in × 124 in) Uffizi, Florence

I've  used this image regularly in my introduction to Visual Communication. There are aspects of the composition that are intriguing. The thing to point out is the placement of the groups of figures to the left and right of Venus in the centre. Mercury is far left and Zephyr to eh far right. This suggests that that painting is to be read as at least three episodes of a narrative. This introduces the relationship between framing, composition and time in the image.

Framing is important here on many levels. Not least in relation to the organisation of space and also in the representation of time in the image. It is intuitive for western viewers to assume that, as a consequence of habits of reading, that visual messages are to be read from left to right in a similar way as to the reading of a text. But the opposite is the case with the above image. If the experts are right, the image is a representation of Spring - the title really gives this away. Venus is presiding over her garden. To the left Chloris is being transformed into Flora - the goddess of flowers, having been raped by Zephyr. To the right of Venus are the three graces. Cupid overlooks the action above Venus. Mercury is idly poking clouds. The advent of springtime is indicated by zephyr - the west wind. The progress of spring by Chloris' transformation into Flora. Thus there are three distinctive episodes. Time in the still image. Crude but on the level of composition, very interesting.